Engineering,
Multi-disciplinary engineering design — structural, civil, MEP — delivered with BIM at the centre rather than at the end. We collaborate with architects from the earliest stages, contributing engineering decisions while the design is still flexible, not after geometry is locked.
Coordinated design from concept through detail to construction-ready documentation. Performance-driven calculations support every recommendation. Sustainability metrics tracked throughout, not retrofitted at PC3.
Best applied on mid-to-large projects where the engineering team needs to move at the same pace as the architects, with the same digital fluency.
What
MEP Design & Engineering
Mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems designed and coordinated within the federated model from concept through detail.
Piping Design & Detail Engineering
Process and utility piping routed, sized, and detailed to isometric and fabrication-ready standards.
Process Engineering
Process flow diagrams, P&IDs, and equipment sizing grounded in real operating conditions.
CFD & FEA Analysis
Computational fluid dynamics and finite element analysis validating designs against real-world thermal, structural, and flow performance.
How
Concept engineering
Early-stage feasibility and load paths agreed with the architectural team before geometry locks in.
Schematic design coordination
Cross-discipline coordination through the schematic phase, federated weekly.
Design development
Iterative refinement informed by performance analysis and contractor early-input where applicable.
Construction documentation
Drawings, schedules, specifications, and BIM deliverables prepared for tender.
Tender & construction support
Clarifications during tender, RFIs during construction, change-management throughout.
Standards
Standards
Eurocodes / Indian Standards (IS 800, IS 456)
ASHRAE 90.1 / 62.1
ISO 19650
LEED / BREEAM (where applicable)
Tools
Revit (architecture / structure / MEP)
Civil 3D / Infraworks
Robot Structural Analysis / SAFE
IES Virtual Environment
Tekla Structures
Proof,
Mixed-Use Developer
Marina Bay, Singapore · 2023
CFD-informed MEP design that cut cooling load by 18%.
18%
Cooling load reduction vs baseline
6
Design options simulated
LOD 350
Coordinated MEP model delivered
A mixed-use podium needed full MEP design plus environmental performance analysis, with the atrium's natural ventilation strategy still undecided at concept stage. We ran CFD across six atrium design options in parallel — the results directly shaped the final façade perforation and ventilation strategy.
Financial Services Firm
Mumbai, India · 2023
Concept to construction-issue MEP in 18 weeks.
18 wks
Concept to construction issue
<40
Residual clashes at issue
14,000 m²
Floor area designed
A relocating headquarters needed a fully coordinated MEP package on an accelerated programme. We ran coordination continuously through the design phase rather than as a late clash-detection exercise, resolving issues as they arose instead of accumulating them.
Industrial Client
Jubail, Saudi Arabia · 2022
Piping design validated before a single pipe was cut.
0
Fabrication rework cycles
6
Process systems engineered
12 wks
Design to fabrication release
A process expansion required piping and utility routing validated against real operating conditions before fabrication. FEA and process simulation confirmed the design, avoiding a costly late-stage rework cycle common on similar expansions.
Residential Developer
Manchester, UK · 2024
Structural design that shaved four storeys of transfer beams.
4
Storeys of transfer structure removed
15%
Structural steel tonnage saved
£1.2M
Estimated construction saving
A residential tower's early structural concept relied on heavy transfer beams to work around a constrained podium layout. We re-ran the structural scheme with an alternative column grid, engineering out the transfer structure entirely and simplifying the build sequence for the contractor.
Airport Operator
Doha, Qatar · 2023
Thermal modelling that kept a terminal comfortable without oversizing plant.
22%
Plant capacity reduction vs concept
£800K
Capital cost saved on plant
0
Comfort complaints post-occupancy
A terminal expansion's initial mechanical concept oversized cooling plant to cover worst-case occupancy assumptions. Dynamic thermal simulation against real passenger flow data let us right-size the system, cutting capital cost without compromising comfort at peak season.
Energy Utility
Perth, Australia · 2022
Pipe stress analysis that cleared a plant expansion for fabrication.
0
Redesign cycles before release
8
Pipe systems stress-tested
6 wks
Analysis to fabrication release
A utility's plant expansion needed piping validated against thermal cycling and seismic loading before fabrication could be released. Stress analysis across the full network confirmed the design met code with margin, avoiding the redesign cycle that had delayed the previous phase.
What
Engineering that only looks right on paper costs you later. Every system we design is sized against real performance criteria and coordinated with architecture from concept — not bolted on once the geometry is already locked. That means CFD and FEA results inform decisions before they're locked in, not after — and every recommendation carries the analysis behind it, not just professional judgement.
Every system is sized and validated against real performance criteria, not just drawn to look right.
We contribute engineering decisions while geometry is still flexible, working alongside architects from day one.
CFD and FEA results sit behind our design choices, not just experience and rules of thumb.
Detail design accounts for how it actually gets built and fabricated, reducing site RFIs.
Every sizing and performance decision is documented against the calculation or simulation that justified it, not left to institutional memory.
Structural, MEP, and civil systems are checked against applicable codes as design develops, not left for a compliance pass at the end.
Parametric models let us re-run options quickly when a client brief changes, instead of rebuilding the scheme from scratch.
Simulation-backed design decisions are made fast enough to keep pace with an accelerated programme, not slow it down.
Where
Sectors
Hospitality & Retail
MEP and environmental design for atrium-heavy hotel and retail schemes.
Commercial & Office
Structural and MEP design for high-rise and mixed-use towers.
Healthcare
Performance-critical MEP design for hospitals and clinical environments.
Energy & Oil/Gas
Process and piping engineering for refineries and process plant.
Infrastructure
Civil and structural design for bridges, transit, and public works.
Perfect
Two ways to work with us, side by side — pick the shape that matches your scope, or let a discovery call decide it for you.
Single Specialist
One senior engineer for a defined design package — a single system or a bounded analysis task.
- Best for one system (MEP, structural, or piping)
- Direct engineer-to-client communication
- Efficient for concept or feasibility studies
- Fast turnaround on CFD/FEA analysis requests
Best for
Scoped design or analysis packages.
Dedicated Team
A multi-disciplinary engineering team covering MEP, structural, and process design in parallel.
- Best for full-building, multi-system design
- Coordinated design across all engineering disciplines
- Embedded through concept to construction support
- Scales with project complexity and programme
Best for
Full-scope engineering design programmes.
How it works
Let's have a discovery call
Share your project scope, timeline, and technical requirements — we listen before we propose anything.
Get matched to the right shape
Within a few days we propose whether a single specialist or a dedicated team fits your scope best.
Onboard and scale as needed
Start quickly, then scale the engagement up or down as the programme demands — no renegotiation required.
What
“The CFD results didn’t just validate our design — they changed it, for the better, before we’d committed to steel.”
Design Director
Architecture · Mixed-Use Developer
“They moved at the same pace as our architects. That almost never happens with an engineering consultant.”
Project Lead
Development · Commercial Developer
“Fewer than 40 residual clashes across an entire building. That’s not typical — that’s a team that coordinates as they design.”
BIM Manager
MEP Design · Financial Services Firm
